Translate

Friday, May 5, 2017

A DELAWARE PASTOR'S ANSWER FOR A CHURCH IN DECLINE: MAKE CHURCH A BUSINESS; BE A STATISTICS FANATIC; LEARN TO BE A TECHIE; BE "MISSIONAL" & PURPOSE DRIVEN LIKE RICK WARREN

 DELAWARE'S PROBLEMS FOUND 
IN ITS SPIRITUAL DEADNESS
THIS PASTOR IS IN A PANIC 
AND AT A DEAD END! 
WHAT TO DO WHEN A CHURCH CAN'T GET PEOPLE SAVED OR DISCIPLED? CLOSE UP? NEVER!
GET 250 INSTEAD OF 150 VISITORS PER YEAR TO KEEP GROWTH AT 5% MINIMUM TO PAY BILLS?
TRY "SERVANT (STEALTH) EVANGELISM" AGAIN LIKE HE TRIED IN JANUARY 2014? 
PICK UP A AN UNNAMED CHURCH GROWTH BOOK AND STUDY IT, REVISE THE CONSTITUTION, BIND CONSCIENCES BY FORCING MEMBERS TO SIGN A NEW MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT, HAVE THE ANNUAL PICNIC MOVED FROM A STATE PARK TO THE CHURCH PARKING LOT, HAVE CHILDREN BUILD "RACE CARS", LOTS OF CONTEMPORARY MUSIC, HAVE THE LADIES STUDY HERETICAL BOOKS, HAVE CHILDREN LEARN CONTEMPLATIVE MYSTICISM THROUGH AWANA, REFERENCE MANY APOSTATES AS MODELS TO FOLLOW IN SERMONS, MAKE NO WARNINGS ABOUT FALSE TEACHERS, BE ECUMENICAL, BE NON-DOCTRINAL, BE LOVING INSTEAD OF JUDGMENTAL, QUOTE OPEN LGBT PEOPLE, QUOTE PSYCHO-HERETICS, ETC.
____________________________________________________
RICK WARREN, BILL HYBELS, LOUIE GIGLIO, ANDY STANLEY, BETH MOORE HAVE THE ANSWERS YET!
SERMON STARTS AT 30 MINUTE MARK AFTER A "WORSHIP" TIME FILLED WITH CCM MUSIC:
 HE FORGOT TO HAVE A NASCAR SERVICE TO BRING IN THE CROWDS!
RUN CHURCH LIKE A BUSINESS RE-DISCOVERED; 
BUT WHAT ARE THEY SELLING? 
SALVATION FOR A PRICE?

INFOWARS IS HIRING

INFOWARS IS HIRING
 Published on May 4, 2017
Apply for a career with Infowars today! Please send your resume, portfolio, background, beliefs, and/or reel to jobs@infowars.com.

Help us spread the word about the liberty movement, we're reaching millions help us reach millions more. Share the free live video feed link with your friends & family: http://www.infowars.com/show

 

DELTA AIRLINES TELLS CALIFORNIA COUPLE TO LOSE THEIR SEATS OR LOSE THEIR KIDS

DELTA AIRLINES TELLS CALIFORNIA COUPLE 
TO LOSE THEIR SEATS OR LOSE THEIR KIDS

Published on May 5, 2017
A family from California was threatened with jail time and then booted off an oversold Delta flight last week for refusing to give up a seat they paid for, according to a report.
https://www.infowars.com/delta-worker...



  Family With Infant Children Booted Off Delta Fight

FREE SPEECH CENSORED/DENIED: ROBERT SPENCER, ISLAMIC SCHOLAR, REJECTED BY BUFFALO & GETTYSBURG COLLEGES~ONLY GETTYSBURG PROVIDES POLICE PROTECTION

 Video: University at Buffalo Left-fascists scream abuse at Robert Spencer, officials do nothing

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/05/video-university-at-buffalo-left-fascists-scream-abuse-at-robert-spencer-officials-do-nothing; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
This video is just a minute and a half long, but it gives you the flavor of the event. The Left-fascists and Islamic supremacists at the University at Buffalo kept this up for the full hour and a half, while university officials stood by and let this circus go on.
A university should be a center for free inquiry where ideas are evaluated rationally on their merits, not indoctrination factories where dissenting opinions are demonized without examination and ruthlessly suppressed. The University at Buffalo is a shameful excuse for a university, and this incident is an everlasting blot on its record.
Politely and courtesy contact UPD Chief of Police Gerald Schoenle at gws3@buffalo.edu. and Tom Tiberi of Campus Life at tiberi@buffalo.edu and politely and courteously call them out for their willful malfeasance and allowance of Left-fascist thuggery. They have besmirched the reputation of their university, which should be renamed the Left-Fascist Training Center at Buffalo, beyond repair.
I discuss episodes like this one in my upcoming book The Complete Infidel’s Guide to Free Speech (and Its Enemies), which you can preorder here.
__________________________________________________________

 

 http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-SgWxqM4_hqA/UVIE0WGb1PI/AAAAAAAACSY/SZV9o1dHAhI/s1600/Qasim+Rashid.jpg

 http://media2.abcactionnews.com/photo/2012/01/25/CAIR_member_Hassan_Shibly_speaks_20120125024310_320_240.JPG

Damage control: After Robert Spencer speech, University at Buffalo hosts TWO lying Muslim spokesmen

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/05/damage-control-after-robert-spencer-speech-u-at-buffalo-hosts-two-lying-muslim-spokesmen; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
This is extraordinary. Since Left-fascists screamed at me for an hour and a half, I barely got a word in at the University at Buffalo, but university officials and the local Muslim Brotherhood MSA chapter are apparently so shaken nonetheless by my appearance that they have featured not one, but two events featuring lying Islamic spokesmen to make sure that campus Left-lemmings stay on message and remember that Islam is a religion of peace that has nothing to do with terrorism, despite the ever-growing amount of evidence to the contrary.
Ahmadi spokesman Qasim Rashid is a professional liar, or as Pamela Geller calls him, “a one-man cottage industry of deception and hypocrisy.” He has whitewashed Muhammad’s support for torture and the reality of jihad violence and Sharia oppression; dissembled about the Qur’an’s sanction of deception of unbelievers; lied about the presence of violent passages in the Qur’an; lied about the Qur’an’s sanction of beating disobedient women; lied about the nature of Sharia; called for limitations on the freedom of speech and expression to outlaw behavior and speech some Muslims may find offensive; and lied about Muhammad’s stance toward the persecution of Christians. When challenged about the “facts” he has presented, he (like virtually all other Islamic supremacists) responds with furious ad hominem contempt, but never answers the refutations of his articles on substantive grounds — because, of course, he cannot do so.
“Maham Alamgir, a sophomore biochemistry major at Niagara University, felt Rashid’s speech highlighted the importance of diversity. ‘It shows that people are different and it’s possible to live in harmony with each other and have differing opinions,’ Alamgir said.”
That’s rich, coming from a student at the University at Buffalo, which is just as much of a hard-Left indoctrination center that demonizes and forbids opposing viewpoints as most other universities today. “It shows that people are different and it’s possible to live in harmony with each other and have differing opinions”? Sure, as long as Left-fascists and Islamic supremacists are screaming abuse and shouting down anyone who dares to dissent.
The university also hosted Hassan Shibly of the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR officials have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.) A California chapter distributed a poster telling Muslims not to talk to the FBI, and a Florida chapter distributed pamphlets with the same message. CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates. A CAIR operative recently called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.
Much more below.

“UB’s MSA presents ‘Exposing Radical Islamophobes’ panel,” by Maddy Fowler, The Spectrum (University at Buffalo), May 4, 2017:
Hassan Shibly believes people are more likely to get struck by lightning than be killed by a terrorist who calls himself Muslim.
Shibly, a civil rights lawyer, UB alumnus and director of the Florida chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), was one of two panelists for an event entitled “Exposing Radical Islamophobes: Breaking Down the Misinformation of Robert Spencer.” The event was hosted by the Muslim Student Association (MSA) and also featured Dr. Katharina Azim, a professor in UB’s psychology department. Roughly 200 people attended the event, which took place in Norton 112 on Wednesday evening.
Azim and Shibly discussed misconceptions about Islam and addressed points made by Robert Spencer in his Monday speech at UB.
Probably not. I was able to make very few points, and none as fully as I would have if the Left-fascists hadn’t been screaming.
Shibly thinks Islamophobia is manufactured by “hate profiteers” and believes it undermines liberty, freedom of speech and safety.
Shibly and all other Islamic supremacist liars know full well that if there really is any suspicion or dislike of Islam or Muslims, it stems from jihad terror, not from “Islamophobes.” What he is trying to do is stigmatize all criticism of Islam and jihad, so that people will be afraid to speak out against jihad and it can advance unimpeded.
A hate profiteer is someone who makes money off of hateful rhetoric based on double standards and information taken out of context, Shibly said. He feels Robert Spencer is a hate profiteer.
The man who works for a Hamas front calls someone who exposes him a “hate profiteer.”
These individuals promote the same lies about Muslims that were made about Jews in Germany 70 years ago, Shibly explained.
“If you compare Nazi quotes about Jews and Spencer’s quotes about Muslims, it is almost verbatim. It’s the same hate with a different target,” Shibly said.
This is a vicious slander, and Shibly’s comparison is an insult to the memory of the Jews who were murdered in the Holocaust. It’s also a common Leftist talking point. Many, many others have made this claim before Shibly, including Noam Chomsky; Bernie Sanders; the notorious non-Muslim Islamic apologist Karen Armstrong; Jeffrey Goldberg, the journalist at The Atlantic who some time ago interviewed Barack Obama about why he won’t call Islamic terrorism Islamic; liberal media pundit Reza Aslan; Muslim Brotherhood-linked Congressman Keith Ellison; Nicholas Kristof, one of the New York Times’ Mideast pontificators; Canadian Muslim leader Syed Sohawardy; and Philadelphia chapter leader of Hamas-linked CAIR, Jacob Bender. Many others have repeated it. The blazingly brilliant Daniel Greenfield takes it apart in this video.
The idea that Muslims are the new Jews is put forward by the Left, but it also has opponents on the Left. In 2014, as part of his ongoing awakening to the nature and reality of the jihad threat, Bill Maher noted: “Jews weren’t oppressing anybody. There weren’t 5,000 militant Jewish groups. They didn’t do a study of treatment of women around the world and find that Jews were at the bottom of it. There weren’t 10 Jewish countries in the world that were putting gay people to death just for being gay.” The late Christopher Hitchens also refuted this idea when writing a few years ago about the notorious Ground Zero Mosque proposal: “’Some of what people are saying in this mosque controversy is very similar to what German media was saying about Jews in the 1920s and 1930s,’ Imam Abdullah Antepli, Muslim chaplain at Duke University, told the New York Times. Yes, we all recall the Jewish suicide bombers of that period, as we recall the Jewish yells for holy war, the Jewish demands for the veiling of women and the stoning of homosexuals, and the Jewish burning of newspapers that published cartoons they did not like.”
Indeed. Further, no one is calling for or justifying genocide of Muslims. No individual or group opposed to Islam is remotely comparable to the National Socialists. Not that facts have ever gotten in the way of a good meme.
He feels people like Spencer are a threat to democracy and liberty.
“When I hear Spencer say that Islam should be illegal, I hear him saying my religion should be outlawed… and what I hear him saying is that he will chip away at the First Amendment to the United States Constitution,” Shibly said.
Shibly is a straight-up liar. I have never said that Islam should be illegal.
…He also feels it is a violation of First Amendment rights when government officials and police officers question Muslims about their faith. He feels such questioning undermines Americans’ safety because officials become so focused on profiling Muslims they miss out on actual criminals.
There’s his game. He wants there to be no law enforcement scrutiny of Muslims. Then the jihad can advance without opposition.
Shibly described a time his family was selected for random questioning at the U.S./Canadian border.
“Random means they saw your headscarf,” Shibly said he remarked to his mother as they were pulled aside into a room of 40 or so people – all of whom were Muslim.
“I swore I was in a mosque,” Shibly said. The group was held “like criminals” for six hours. During that time, a white American man got through the border with no issue, and ended up killing people in Canada.”…
Cry me a river. I was detained for three hours at the Toronto airport, doubtless in part because of the libels and smears of people such as Hassan Shibly. If you had any genuine concern for the safety of Americans, Mr. Shibly, you would put up with these examinations, to which all Americans can be subject.
…Between 1980 and 2005, 7 percent of terrorism was committed by people who claimed to be Jewish, 6 percent was done by people who call themselves Muslim, and “double digits” terror acts were committed by people calling themselves Christian, Shibly said.
It is so easy to lie with statistics. I believe that Shibly is here referring to a spurious study that valued all terror attacks equally: 9/11 was one, and PETA throwing red paint on a woman wearing fur was one. So it wildly overvalued so-called terror attacks by non-Muslims.
Shibly also clarified the definition of Sharia Law, which he said means “path to water.” It is not a specific, monolithic code and is open to debate and interpretation. Sharia aims to protect religion, life, intellect, honor and property, just as the Constitution does, he said. It forbids forcing religious practices and beliefs on non-Muslims.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Sudan are Sharia states. Pakistan is close to being a full Sharia state, as is Afghanistan. How are women’s rights in those countries? Gay rights? How are non-Muslims treated? That’s Sharia.
Shibly continued to slander me:
…“Even though I dramatically disagree with inviting Spencer, I think he has a right to speak. I just don’t think he deserves a platform like the University at Buffalo,” Shibly said.
He feels inviting Spencer to UB is no different than inviting a Nazi.
“Just as I wouldn’t invite a Nazi or a member of the KKK, I certainly wouldn’t invite Spencer,” Shibly said.
Likening analysts of the motives and goals of jihad terror to the Nazis and KKK is clearly an attempt to stigmatize such analysis, such that everyone will be afraid to notice the Islamic identity and motives of jihadis.
He feels the line between free speech and hate speech is inciting violence.
“Hateful rhetoric is not cost free and has led to a dramatic increase in hate crimes,” Shibly said.
In reality, there has been a dramatic increase in fake anti-Muslim hate crimes.
However, he said he was disappointed that Spencer’s speech was disrupted. He feels it would have been more productive to have a discussion.
He said this because he knows that their display made the screaming Left-fascists and Islamic supremacists look bad.
“We should not be afraid to let people speak but also challenge them and be driven not by arrogance and a desire to win debates but a desire to unite our community,” Shibly said….
That’s funny. Hamas-linked CAIR officials refuse to debate me or appear on shows with me. He is spouting falsehoods to fool the Left-lemmings at the University at Buffalo.
Samar Adhami, a graduate student in biology, felt the event was “very necessary” after Spencer’s event.
“A lot of people are not informed because they are so overcome by fear. [The speakers] helped clear up negative connotations,” she said.
Overcome by fear. Sure you are, Samar. Sure.
“Qasim Rashid holds ‘True Islam: A Response to Islamophobes and Terrorists Everywhere’ discussion at UB,” by Maddy Fowler and Daniel Petruccelli, The Spectrum (University at Buffalo), May 4, 2017:
Qasim Rashid, a civil rights attorney, former Harvard University Fellow of Islamic Studies and Amazon bestselling author, spoke at UB Tuesday evening about the misconceptions of Islam.
Qasim Rashid believes there’s a philosophy in media that “if it bleeds, it leads.”
He thinks because Robert Spencer’s speech on Monday was more sensationalized, it garnered more attention. Rashid’s event, by contrast, was smaller, quieter and more peaceful. Approximately 125 people attended the event and 20 people left after Rashid’s lecture.
Maybe mine garnered more attention because of all the screaming Left-fascists who made it impossible for me to speak. Because Rashid was telling them what they wanted to hear, they let him speak.
“Unfortunately, that has dominated our media lives – what’s going to get more clicks, what’s going to get more views,” Rashid said. “I think that’s why people left. If I spoke up there about how Sharia law is coming and Muslims are taking over, I guarantee you we would have had more.”
Not enough people showed up to hear your lies, Qasim? How disappointing! Nice that the university paper gave you a chance to explain away your failure.
…He is not interested in “falsehoods and propaganda,” but rather what he calls the proven model of true Islam.
All Rashid does is retail falsehoods and propaganda.
…Rashid spoke about the importance of women in the founding of Islam. He said women are equal to men, citing a part of Sharia that states all the money a man makes belongs to his wife and she gets to keep all of the money she makes.
A few things left out of this whitewashed presentation: “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” — Qur’an 4:34
Nowhere does the Qur’an teach that a woman can beat a man under any circumstances.
The Qur’an likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as he wills: “Your women are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth as you will” (2:223).
It declares that a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man: “Get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men, then a man and two women, such as you choose, for witnesses, so that if one of them errs, the other can remind her” (2:282).
It allows men to marry up to four wives, and have sex with slave girls also: “If you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if you fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly, then only one, or one that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice” (4:3).
It rules that a son’s inheritance should be twice the size of that of a daughter: “Allah directs you as regards your children’s inheritance: to the male, a portion equal to that of two females” (4:11).
It allows for marriage to pre-pubescent girls, stipulating that Islamic divorce procedures “shall apply to those who have not yet menstruated” (65:4).
Islamic law stipulates that a man’s prayer is annulled if a dog or a woman passes in front of him as he is praying. “Narrated ‘Aisha: The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, “Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying people).” I said, ‘You have made us (i.e. women) dogs.’ I saw the Prophet praying while I used to lie in my bed between him and the Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I would slip away. for I disliked to face him.” (Sahih Bukhari 1.9.490)
Another hadith depicts Muhammad saying that the majority of the inhabitants of hell are women: “I looked into Paradise and I saw that the majority of its people were the poor. And I looked into Hell and I saw that the majority of its people are women.” Sahih Bukhari 3241; Sahih Muslim 2737)
When asked about this, he explained: “I was shown Hell and I have never seen anything more terrifying than it. And I saw that the majority of its people are women.” They said, “Why, O Messenger of Allah?” He said, “Because of their ingratitude (kufr).” It was said, “Are they ungrateful to Allah?” He said, “They are ungrateful to their companions (husbands) and ungrateful for good treatment. If you are kind to one of them for a lifetime then she sees one (undesirable) thing in you, she will say, ‘I have never had anything good from you.’” (Sahih Bukhari 1052)
And in another hadith: “The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) went out to the musalla (prayer place) on the day of Eid al-Adha or Eid al-Fitr. He passed by the women and said, ‘O women! Give charity, for I have seen that you form the majority of the people of Hell.’ They asked, ‘Why is that, O Messenger of Allah?’ He replied, ‘You curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen anyone more deficient in intelligence and religious commitment than you. A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.’ The women asked, ‘O Messenger of Allah, what is deficient in our intelligence and religious commitment?’ He said, ‘Is not the testimony of two women equal to the testimony of one man?’ They said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is the deficiency in her intelligence. Is it not true that a woman can neither pray nor fast during her menses?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is the deficiency in her religious commitment.’” (Sahih Bukhari 304)
Sharia is the moral code by which Muslims live, according to Rashid. He said it is no different than canon law for Catholics or halakha for Jews….
Except for those bits about stoning, amputation, polygamy, child marriage, death for apostasy, and the rest. Rashid follows with two straw men:
The belief that those who do not believe in Islam are killed per Sharia is a falsehood spread by “corrupt clerics” and “Islamophobes,” according to Rashid.
Actually that is not the claim. The claim is that Islam mandates warfare against and subjugation of unbelievers (Qur’an 9:29), not that they should all be killed.
He also addressed misconceptions about Jihad. He said Jihad has been depicted by Islamophobes as “forceful conversion through any means necessary,” but it refers to any kind of struggle. Trying to ace exams, lose weight, or fighting cancer are all forms of engaging in Jihad, according to Rashid.
Another straw man. Jihad’s primary meaning in Islamic theology is not forced conversion, but warfare to establish Sharia.
“The speaker last night was promoting ISIS ideology on campus. He was essentially their spokesperson. That’s how dangerous this rhetoric is,” Rashid said.
These liars can’t stop slandering me. I read from a legal manual endorsed by al-Azhar, the most prestigious and influential institution in Sunni Islam. Rashid calls that “ISIS ideology” because he is trying to mislead his marks into thinking it isn’t as mainstream as it is.
Rashid explained that there are two narratives being written right now: one says that people are so different from one another that one person’s success depends on the other’s failure.
The first narrative helps people gain attention, Rashid said.
“The other narrative, the one where we come together – there’s no money to be made. There’s no fame, there’s no fortune, there’s a lot of ridicule and a lot of harassment behind it as well,” Rashid said.
Note the irony. I was the one ridiculed and harassed, and this liar slanders me and then claims victimhood status.
…Uma Khan felt Rashid’s talk was more productive than Spencer’s because she believes educational dialogue is more helpful than shutting a speaker down.
“Every speaker deserves to say what they have to say, but our response should be an educational response, education has more power,” the sophomore finance major said. “It’s great to have protests but it needs to be a peaceful protest and we have to let the speaker actually speak in order to respond. We don’t just shut someone down like that what happened yesterday.”
Khan said the best defense against anti-Islam speakers such as Robert Spencer is to show the Muslim community’s service, humanity and unity, not just “shutting someone up.”
“Because now that’s his defense, he used that against us,” Khan said….
Right you are, Uma. I sure did. And I’m going to keep on doing so, because what happened there exposed the thuggish and authoritarian heart of contemporary academia.
_______________________________________________________
  Photo Credit: Gettysburg College Communications and Marketing
Left-fascist Gettysburg College President Janet Riggs calls for boycott of Robert Spencer lecture
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
At Todd Green’s lecture Sunday, Gettysburg College President Janet Morgan Riggs said: “My fantasy is that we will have four or five people sitting in a room with Robert Spencer, and the other 2,500 members with Jerome at his rally. I think that’s what we can do to counter the fear that a speaker like this can bring to this community.”
Riggs should be ashamed. If the Muslims at the university really think I am not telling the truth, they should come and engage me in discussion during the Q and A, and prove me wrong. They can’t, so they’re boycotting, and instead of exhorting students to engage unwelcome and unpopular ideas and deal with them on a rational basis, the president of the university is encouraging them.
In this letter responding to alumni threats over my appearance, Riggs uncritically accepts and retails the defamatory and libelous falsehoods that I am “bigoted” and “hateful,” and somehow endanger Muslim students.
I hereby challenge President Riggs: prove your statements with quotations from my own writings, not from smear pieces from the Southern Poverty Law Center or other far-Left groups that have no intention of treating their targets fairly. Substantiate your characterizations of my work from my work, or retract and apologize. Also, I invite you to come to the lecture tonight, if you don’t end up canceling it, and if I am not shouted down by the Left-fascist thugs you are enabling and encouraging, then I challenge you to find any “hatred” or “bigotry” in anything I say.
I do hope you will take up my challenge, but obviously you will not do so. For being a president of a college who actively discourages the consideration of views that dissent from the establishment line, and actively discouraging critical thinking and free inquiry, you should be made to resign in disgrace. Instead, you will no doubt be hailed as a heroine by your Left-fascist peers and colleagues.
“President Janet Morgan Riggs responds to open letter from alums on Robert Spencer,” by Janet Morgan Riggs, Gettysburg College President The Gettysburgian, May 1, 2017:
Editor’s Note: The following letter is a response from College president Janet Morgan Riggs to the open letter sent by 375 alums urging President Riggs to not allow Robert Spencer to speak on Wednesday.
I want to begin by thanking those who signed the petition requesting that we rescind our invitation to Robert Spencer for caring enough about Gettysburg College to speak out. To say this is a complex situation would be an understatement.
Many Gettysburgians have expressed perspectives about whether or not Robert Spencer should be permitted to speak on our campus. Some think we should have denied YAF’s request to invite him and that we should have over‐ruled Student Senate’s thoughtful deliberations which led them to make the decision to approve this event. I have also heard from many who believe that allowing Robert Spencer to speak is the right thing to do, despite the fact that they find his views to be offensive and/or abhorrent.
I don’t know if our alumni who signed the petition have seen the letter I sent to campus about this, but you can find it here:
www.gettysburg.edu/about/offices/president/inclusion/pdfs/2017/MessagefromthePresident_email+4‐25‐17.pdf
This letter was intended to provide some information to members of the campus community about the decision‐making process, the challenge of balancing our values, and the additional speaker that was invited.
We are concerned for the Muslim members of our community and have met with Muslim students to talk about what we might do to support them. We have also reached out to Muslim members of our faculty and staff, and some faculty members have reached out to our Muslim students to offer their personal support. Discussions are being held in classes, and students are planning a solidarity rally to be held at the same time that Spencer will be speaking—not as a protest of the speech, but as a way of showing their support for the Muslim community.
I appreciate the passion that our alumni have expressed on both sides of this controversy. It’s quite clear that our alumni are not united in their viewpoints. In one of the letters I received supporting the decision to allow Robert Spencer to speak, one of our graduates quoted American Civil Liberties Union National Legal Director David Cole: “For the future of our democracy, we must protect bigoted speech from government censorship. On college campuses, that means that the best way to combat hateful speech is through counter‐speech, vigorous and creative protest, and debate, not threats of violence or censorship.”
This is an extraordinarily complicated and challenging situation, one that is being played out on college campuses across the nation. I can assure you that we are giving this a tremendous amount of thought and attention, and I am pleased that our alumni care enough about Gettysburg College to voice their perspectives.
Sincerely,
Janet Morgan Riggs
President
______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
 http://gettysburgian.com/2017/05/president-janet-morgan-riggs-responds-to-open-letter-from-alums/
_________________________________________________
 Video: Robert Spencer on Islam and free speech 
at Gettysburg College
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS: 
 Thanks again to the police and security personnel who were out in force 
last night as I spoke at Gettysburg College. They ensured that 
Left-fascists would not disrupt the event as they did Monday at the 
University at Buffalo. And now you can see the presentation yourself and
 judge whether saying these things warrants all the outrage with which 
my invitation to speak was greeted.

CONGRESS VOTES TO DEFUND MURDER FACTORY PLANNED PARENTHOOD, BUT ONLY FOR ONE YEAR

CONGRESS VOTES TO DEFUND MURDER FACTORY PLANNED PARENTHOOD

Published on May 5, 2017
Pro-life advocates praised the bills elimination of funding for Planned Parenthood. “We commend the House, which by this vote has – for the third time – voted to end taxpayer funding to Planned Parenthood, the nation’s most profitable abortionist,” said Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel Kevin Theriot. http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/house-vote...
https://www.infowars.com/the-best-thi...
https://www.infowars.com/hillary-clin...

__________________________________________________
 U.S. House Votes to Reduce Planned Parenthood Funding for One Year Under Republican Healthcare Bill 
BY HEATHER CLARK
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 WASHINGTON — The U.S. House of 
Representatives voted 217 to 213 on Thursday to repeal and replace the 
Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, reducing—but not 
completely eliminating—funding for the abortion and contraception giant 
Planned Parenthood for one year in the process.
The American Health Care Act (AHCA) will strip Planned Parenthood of $390 million of the more than $450 million it receives in federal funding each year. Speaker Paul Ryan said in January that the funding would be redirected to community health centers, which do not perform abortions.
“[W]e think it’s better to send these dollars to those clinics that do a very good job of giving women the services they need—the preventative services—without all the controversy surrounding Planned Parenthood,” he said.
The remaining $60 million will continue to be provided through the National Family Planning Program under Title X, reports state.

Planned Parenthood claimed on Thursday following the House vote that the move will make it more difficult for mothers to have healthy pregnancies and raise families.
“This is the worst bill for women’s health in a generation,” President Cecile Richards said in a statement. “It makes it harder to prevent unintended pregnancy, harder to have a healthy pregnancy, and harder to raise a family. … Women and men across the country will fight to protect access to Planned Parenthood and to defeat this bill.”
While AHCA does not mention Planned Parenthood by name, it defines “prohibited entities” as those who perform abortions other than in the cases of rape, incest and the life of the mother, and who receive more than $350,000,000 from Medicaid.

Pro-life and religious liberty organizations cheered the news, stating that taxpayer funds should not be provided to controversial organizations that kill unborn children and are the subject of numerous legal probes.
“As a nation, we are without excuse in paying for abortion on demand in Obamacare and subsidizing Planned Parenthood’s gruesome trafficking of baby body parts and its inhumane treatment of mothers and their unborn children,” said Tony Perkins, president of the Washington-based Family Research Council.
“Congress’s well-founded concern that Planned Parenthood and its affiliates are engaged in a pattern of deceptive practices designed to maximize their bottom-line revenue should be enough reason to end the public largesse on their behalf, even apart from the fact that they destroy a third of a million human lives every year and have been involved in numerous other scandals,” also remarked Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) Senior Counsel Kevin Theriot.
The bill now moves to the Senate, where it needs 51 votes to pass.
According to the organization’s latest annual report, Planned Parenthood performed 323,999 abortions nationwide during the 2014-2015 fiscal year. The figure accounts for at least one-third of all abortions nationwide, when compared to statistics released in November by the Centers for Disease Control.
Planned Parenthood’s largest focus in 2014-2015 was sexually transmitted diseases (STD’s), as it tested and/or treated over four million people for sexual ailments, with over 3.5 million tests and 32 thousand men and women being treated for ailments contracted through sexual activity.
Over 2.9 million people were provided with contraceptives or other forms of birth control in 2014—from temporary to permanent, including over 900 thousand emergency contraception kits. The figure is down from 3.5 million the year before, and 3.7 million in 2012.
Planned Parenthood does not provide mammograms as it is not licensed to operate mammogram machines, and its annual report outlined that fewer than 700,000 women received services surrounding cervical cancer screenings (pap smears for women who have been sexually active), equating to just seven percent of its services.
Sex-related services, such as STD testing and contraceptives, accounted for 76 percent of its business, as opposed to women’s health or post and pre-natal services.
_________________________________________________________
 Planned Parenthood Admits Abortion Is Murder
 Published on May 5, 2017
Even the racist Margaret Sanger admitted abortion was murder and wouldn't dream of performing them even on those she deemed less than human.

 1952-QUOTE FROM FOUNDER MARGARET SANGER ADMITS ABORTION IS MURDER;
1970-FIRST ABORTION DONE BY PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFTER SANGER DIED IN 1966
1974-ROE VS. WADE DECISION
1976-70,000 ABORTIONS PERFORMED

VIDEO: CRAZED LEFTIST TEACHER WANTS ALEX JONES KILLED FOR "BRAINWASHING" PEOPLE; ALTHOUGH CLAIMING FREE SPEECH RIGHTS FOR THOSE SHE AGREES WITH

 Video: Crazed Leftist Wants Alex Jones Killed For "Brainwashing" People
VIDEO: CRAZED LEFTIST TEACHER WANTS ALEX JONES KILLED FOR "BRAINWASHING" PEOPLE 
 "I want Alex Jones to be taken out for brainwashing" says "tolerant", progressive liberal
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
An extraordinary confrontation caught on video shows a deranged leftist calmly explaining why she thinks Alex Jones should be killed for exercising his free speech.
The encounter, filmed by Michael DiBari, begins with DiBari asking the woman, “Alex Jones needs to be killed, is that what you’re saying?”
“Yeah, I am,” responds the woman, who is apparently a teacher.
“I want Alex Jones to be taken out for brainwashing,” explains the woman, before claiming “I believe in free speech” (except presumably speech which disagrees with her opinion, in which case the thought criminal should be subject to summary execution).

The woman’s partner then claims the man is “getting very aggressive,” despite the fact that she just literally called for someone to be killed for having a different opinion.
The woman then inexplicably bursts into tears before claiming, “My son has been completely brainwashed by this asshole,” and then stops crying immediately.
“And so you wanna kill him rather than listen to what this man has to say….you wanna kill free speech?” asks DiBari.

The woman’s partner then gets in DiBari’s face before pathetically backing down as soon as DiBari shows he isn’t afraid.
You’re the one that’s brain damaged lady, you’re the one that’s pissing all over the First Amendment, DiBari continues, asking her if she would also like to kill Ann Coulter and Milo Yiannopoulos.
“How many people do you want killed that you don’t agree with, lady – tell me how much totalitarian Nazi bullshit you got in you?” he asks.
The woman claims she “listens to the views of other people” (while advocating for their execution). When asked to mention one thing that she disagrees with, her only response is “it’s brainwashing”.
The woman then claims that her demeanor is peaceful, prompting scorn from DiBari.
“Oh yes you’re so calm, you’re so calm and so reasonable,” he chides her, while pointing out that she just literally called for someone to be killed for their opinion.
“It’s almost like I’m watching an animal right now at a zoo,” the woman responds.
“Oh now I’m an animal at a zoo, should I be killed too?” asks DiBari.
The woman repeats her progressive opinion that only “Alex Jones” should be killed.
“Get out of my sight, you disgust me, you make me sick,” DiBari tells the woman before she walks away.
The video above is yet another example of how Trump derangement syndrome remains virulent throughout the United States.
While preaching tolerance and diversity, leftists literally want to see people who have a different opinion killed.
 

GOP HOUSE KEEPS MUCH OF OBAMACARE IN "REPEAL & REPLACE" BILL~PASSES WITH SMALL MARGIN

 LIES, DECEPTION OR IGNORANCE? 
THE PERPETUATION OF GLOBALIST-SOCIALIST MEDICAL CARE
GOP HOUSE KEEPS MUCH OF OBAMACARE IN "REPEAL & REPLACE" BILL~PASSES WITH SMALL MARGIN
BY ALEX NEWMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Despite virtually every Republican at the federal level running on a platform of repealing ObamaCare, the GOP-controlled House of Representatives just voted to retain the bulk of it under the guise of “repeal and replace.” Now, in addition to keeping in place a dizzying array of unconstitutional and destructive federal meddling in healthcare, Republicans have ensured that they will get the blame as costs continue to surge and care becomes increasingly difficult to access. Everyday Americans and constitutional governance, as usual, will be the main losers. Now the fight moves to the Senate, where analysts expect lawmakers to retain even more of ObamaCare.
The vote in the House was extremely close, with 213 against and 217 in favor. All Democrats, along with some Republicans, voted against the legislation, dubbed the “American Health Care Act” (AHCA). Indeed, media outlets reported that Democrats in the House taunted Republicans, singing “na na, na na na na, hey hey hey, goodbye,” apparently a reference to their belief that GOP lawmakers will be defeated in the 2018 mid-term elections due to their vote. House Democrat leader Nancy Pelosi called the bill “a zombie, even more scary than before.” A coalition of Big Government Republicans also opposed it. Some liberty-minded Republicans, meanwhile, opposed it for not getting rid of ObamaCare.
Despite deceptive coverage of the bill by much of the establishment media, which went along with the ruse that the AHCA repeals ObamaCare, the legislation actually keeps huge swaths of the unconstitutional statute in place. For instance, under the GOP version of ObamaCare, most of ObamaCare's regulations, mandates, decrees, and meddling are kept firmly in place. It keeps subsidies for insurance, and penalties for not having it, but changes a few relatively minor elements. While the bill purports to “allow” states to “apply” for waivers from some mandates, the legislation simply requires that states create what critics slammed as “mini-ObamaCare” schemes at the state level to obtain the exemptions.

Trump was evidently pleased with it, though. “Insurance companies are fleeing ObamaCare - it is dead,” he said on social media, correctly noting that ObamaCare was imploding in on itself as insurers withdrew in large numbers. “Our healthcare plan will lower premiums and deductibles - and be great healthcare!” Illustrating a possible lack of constitutional understanding, or perhaps a willingness to put politics above the Constitution, Trump vowed that “we're going to take care of a lot of people” and their health needs, and that “we've all fought very hard to be able to do that.” The feds have no constitutional power to do that. 
Speaking from the Rose Garden at the White House after the legislation was approved in the House, Trump again claimed the bill would reduce premiums and deductibles, something disputed by a wide array of special-interest groups and analysts. Trump also argued that the bill was “incredibly well crafted.” “Make no mistake about it, this is a repeal and replace of Obamacare,” he insisted, adding that it would get through the Senate. Establishment GOP leaders in Congress also celebrated the measure as if it represented the fulfillment of their promise to repeal ObamaCare. 
But more than a few critics among conservatives and constitutionalists rejected the phony narrative. Among the principled Republicans who stood firm against the scheme was Representative Andy Biggs, a freshman from Arizona. “I have opposed the AHCA from the very beginning because it is not a clean repeal of Obamacare,” he explained. “While I applaud all the hard work of the House Freedom Caucus, which has made every effort in recent weeks to improve this legislation, the final bill unfortunately does not meet the promises I made to my constituents.”
Congressman Biggs attempted to get two amendments included in the final legislation to reflect the wishes of his constituents, get the ACHA closer to a full repeal ObamCare, and lower the “crushing health insurance premiums that are devastating Arizona families,” he said in a statement posted online. “I am disappointed that my amendments will not be included in the final AHCA package,” he added. “However, I remain committed to a full repeal of Obamacare and will continue to work with my colleagues to accomplish this end.”
Other liberty-minded Republicans echoed those concerns using even stronger language. Representative Walter Jones (R-N.C.), for instance, blasted the bill as rushed, highly flawed, and opposed by the constituents he represents. “It’s time to scrap this flawed bill and start over,” he declared in a statement. “Go out across the country, gather people’s input, and use an open, public process to thoughtfully craft a bill that delivers the relief the American people need.” Representative Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), among the most faithful members of Congress when it comes to obeying his oath of office to the Constitution, noted that the ACHA involves “replacing mandates, subsidies and penalties with mandates, subsidies and penalties.”
The conservative and constitutionalist GOP lawmakers who voted “nay” included members of the liberty-oriented House Freedom Caucus. While the caucus acknowledged earlier that the “revised version still does not fully repeal Obamacare,” most of their members agreed to support it “to keep our promise to the American people to lower healthcare costs.” A number of prominent conservative groups, including Heritage Action for American and FreedomWorks, took a similar position, giving GOP lawmakers cover to vote for the bill because it ostensibly represents progress toward the ultimate goal of eventually repealing ObamaCare.
Some principled grassroots organizations, though, opposed the scheme. The constitutionalist John Birch Society, which publishes this magazine and has chapters across America, has been urging its members to push for a full and complete repeal — and only a full repeal, such as the exact same repeal bill that was repeatedly sent to Obama when Republicans knew he would veto it. Instead of replacing the unconstitutional ObamaCare with something else, the organization called for the federal government to obey the Constitution and get out of healthcare completely, beginning with full repeal of ObamaCare. “We urge our members and supporters to contact their congressmen to let them know not to pass a repeal and replace bill, rather to pass a repeal-only bill,” reads a May 4 statement issued by JBS Vice President for Communications Bill Hahn.
Among other reasons for the group's firm position are the plain limits on federal power enshrined in the Constitution. “When looking at healthcare legislation, we need to ask ourselves, `Is there a limit to the federal government? Can it provide for all the needs of its citizens?` The U.S. Constitution answers this by granting enumerated powers to each of its three branches,” the JBS said. “The power to fund or regulate healthcare is not granted to any branch of the federal government, so according to the 9th and 10th Amendments, the states and the people retain this power. If state legislatures want to offer healthcare to citizens, then that battle should be fought there and not within the U.S. Congress.”
Other liberty-minded organizations, meanwhile, blasted the new bill for keeping in place huge swaths of ObamaCare, including many of the worst provisions responsible for soaring costs and reduced care. “The leadership calls this `repeal and replace,` but it is actually `retain and renew,`” explained Campaign for Liberty President Norm Singleton, whose organization urged members to contact Congress and ask that their representatives oppose the scheme. “Like the so-called ObamaCare replacement bill that was pulled from the floor last month, this new bill preserves most of ObamaCare’s regulations and mandates. It also retains the Republican version of the individual mandate that was a centerpiece of Ryan’s original legislation.”
The grassroots leader also suggested that the consequences of this bill would be disastrous for liberty, healthcare, and the GOP. “If Paul Ryan succeeds in retaining and renewing ObamaCare, we may not get another chance to repeal ObamaCare — at least not before the government’s interference causes the health care system to collapse,” Singleton warned, suggesting the GOP would now get the blame for the looming crisis in healthcare. “And if this Republican Congress rams through a phony repeal so they can issue press releases and run campaign ads about how they repealed ObamaCare, they won’t deserve another chance.”
The healthcare vote to keep much of ObamaCare follows another recent betrayal of voters by establishment GOP lawmakers. Under the guise of preventing what they claimed would be a “government shutdown,” establishment Republicans in Congress joined with Democrats to pass a massive spending bill filled with funding for virtually every unconstitutional program and agency they campaigned against. Over 100 liberty-minded Republicans defected. Among other concerns, they noted that the “stop-gap” bill funds abortion giant Planned Parenthood and sanctuary cities, while specifically prohibiting any spending on Trump's long-promised border wall.
The AHCA now goes to the Senate, where political analysts expect it will undergo further changes to retain even more of ObamaCare. Trump has insisted it will pass. But with Democrats, the United Nations, and many crony special interests united against it — along with potential opposition from some liberty-oriented GOP lawmakers and some Big Government-minded Republicans — approval in the Senate remains far from certain. Either way, Americans who supported Republican candidates based on the promise that they would repeal ObamaCare are going to be sorely disappointed once they find out what is in it. But the fight may not be over yet.

Related articles:
Freedom Caucus Endorses Amended ObamaCare Replacement
UN: Repealing ObamaCare Violates “International Law”
Free Market Healthcare Reform
Trump Threatens House Freedom Caucus for Rejecting ObamaCare Replacement
House Republicans Release ObamaCare Replacement Bill
Audit Reveals Millions in ObamaCare Tax Credits Awarded to Ineligible Recipients
Healthcare: Which Fix Should We Follow?
ObamaCare Unraveled
Does Single-payer Signal a Solution?
Government-run Healthcare
_____________________________________________________
 FULL SPEECH: President Trump On Historic House Obamacare So-Called "Repeal"
 
 

TRUMP'S EXECUTIVE ORDER PROMOTING FREE SPEECH & RELIGIOUS LIBERTY~WITH ECUMENICAL APOSTATES SURROUNDING

TRUMP'S EXECUTIVE ORDER PROMOTING FREE SPEECH & RELIGIOUS LIBERTY 
APOSTATE WORD OF FAITH PASTRIX PAULA WHITE STOOD CLOSE TO TRUMP IN PINK 

Published on May 4, 2017
President Trump marked the National Day of Prayer by signing an executive order aimed at boosting religious freedom by easing IRS restrictions against political activities by tax-exempt religious organizations, including churches.

Declaring "no one should be censoring sermons," Trump announced the order, which fulfilled a campaign pledge, during a Rose Garden ceremony Thursday attended by religious leaders, activists and Vice President Pence.

“We will not allow people of faith to be targeted, bullied or silenced again and we will never stand for religious discrimination,” Trump said before signing the order, which states it is now administration policy is “to protect and vigorously promote religious liberty.”
 THE ECUMENICAL APOSTATES BACK UP TRUMP