Saturday, January 28, 2017


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Establishment globalists were right to be concerned about the fate of their schemes. After a fast-paced first week of putting “America First” by targeting pseudo-“free trade” regimes and rogue regulatory agencies, President Donald Trump is reportedly preparing to take on the United Nations. Its swarms of agencies, programs, bureaucracies, conventions, and associated schemes are also in the crosshairs. According to a January 25 report in the anti-Trump New York Times, which claimed to have seen a set of draft orders being prepared by the administration, Trump plans to drastically reduce the U.S. government's role at the UN and other international organizations. He is also planning a review of sovereignty-stealing UN treaties, with a view toward restoring self-government in various policy areas and saving U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars. Globalists everywhere are in a panic.
Under one of the two draft orders, headlined “Auditing and Reducing U.S. Funding of International Organization,” the U.S. government would cut funding to any UN agency or international organization that meets any specific criteria. One of those criteria, the Times reported, was granting full membership to the Palestinian Authority (PA) or the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Deceitfully, the Times did not mention until close to the bottom of its report is the fact that two 1990s-era federal laws already require the U.S. government to halt all funding to any UN entity that admits the PA or PLO as a member state. That is why the UN's extremist “education” agency UNESCO has been defunded, despite Obama's best efforts. Then-President Bill Clinton signed one of those measures into law, with the other being signed by George H.W. Bush.

Also subject to being defunded under Trump's draft executive order, according to the Times, is any UN or international outfit that “is controlled or substantially influenced by any state that sponsors terrorism.” That would likely include the UN's widely ridiculed “Human Rights Council.” The extremist body, run by an Islamic dictatorship's prince who equated Trump with ISIS and claims “international law” requires “robust gun control” in America, is literally dominated by a majority of un-free regimes — including some of the most savage and murderous dictatorships on the planet that have sponsored terrorism for decades. UN entities controlled or substantially influenced by regimes that persecute marginalized groups or systematically violate human rights would also be defunded.
While specific states were not mentioned in the Times report about Trump's orders, the brutal Communist Chinese dictatorship would appear to be a prime target. Among other crimes, it ruthlessly persecutes Christians, Muslims, Falun Gong practitioners, and other religious minorities — with some even having their body organs harvested and offered to Communist Party bigwigs or wealthy foreigners. In Tibet, Beijing is perpetrating what is widely referred to around the world as the “cultural genocide” of the ancient nation, essentially seeking to wipe it off the face of the Earth forever. And yet, despite its well-documented barbarism, which includes killing more people than any government in human history, the regime's agents currently lead at least a half-dozen UN agencies.
Other requirements under the draft order include instituting cuts of “at least 40 percent” in all remaining U.S. taxpayer funding to international organizations. The Times claimed it was not clear whether the order was intended to cut 40 percent or more of the American funding for each UN agency, or whether the cuts were aimed at the entire federal funding budget feeding the array of largely hostile international bureaucracies. Also set to be reviewed, according to the orders, is any funding that could be diverted to the International Criminal Court (ICC), a kangaroo court that claims to have jurisdiction over every person on Earth, including Americans and journalists, despite the fact that the U.S. Senate never ratified the agreement creating it.  
The first order would also establish a committee to recommend where to make cuts to U.S. funding for UN agencies and other globalist outfits. That body would be tasked with, among other specific responsibilities, investigating U.S. funding for a number of UN agencies and bureaucracies. Among them is the International Criminal Court, which in recent months threatened that it was considering hauling U.S. troops in. The ICC tried to jail a journalist, too. Also set to be scrutinized are the UN's scandal-plagued “peacekeeping” missions, which have been notable primarily for the wide-scale rape of children, the slaughter of civilians, the persecution of those who blow the whistle, and other crimes. Finally, the UN Population Fund, which has been implicated in aiding the Communist Chinese regime in its forced abortions and its savage population-control regime, is also set to be examined.
The second draft executive action purportedly seen by the Times is the “Moratorium on New Multilateral Treaties.” According to the report, the order would demand a review of all current and pending multilateral treaties involving more than one foreign government. The review would be followed by recommendations on which negotiations, conventions, or treaties the U.S. government should ditch. That order specifically mentions the “Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women,” which has been weaponized by governments worldwide to assault freedom and family. It also mentions the UN “Convention on the Rights of the Child,” a totalitarian scheme that Scottish lawmakers cited to justify the assignment of a named bureaucrat to oversee the upbringing and indoctrination of each and every child. The U.S. Senate has refused to ratify either scheme.
The second order on multilateral treaties exempts any treaty “directly related to national security, extradition or international trade.” The Times absurdly — pathetically, almost — tried to claim that might exempt the UN's pseudo-treaty on alleged man-made global warming known as the “Paris Agreement” because it touches on “trade.” In the real world, Trump has already promised to “cancel” that illegal UN scheme, which was never ratified by the Senate anyway. And immediately upon taking office, the White House website vowed to dismantle Obama's illegal “Climate Action Plan,” which was the centerpiece of Obama's illegal “commitments” under the UN climate regime. Plus, without the trillions in loot from U.S. and Western taxpayers promised to the UN “Green Climate Fund,” virtually every Third World regime on Earth has already promised to walk away
It is unclear whether the latest report is accurate or even substantially accurate. The Times, which has lost much of its credibility in recent months with its anti-Trump hysteria masquerading as journalism, has been widely criticized across the political spectrum for its extreme bias in favor of Hillary Clinton, the man-made global-warming theory, globalism, and Big Government. It played a key role in covering up the Soviet genocide of Ukrainians, in bringing Castro the “freedom fighter” to power in Cuba, and in advancing the globalist agenda of swamp central aka the Council on Foreign Relations. In fact, after resigning, a reporter for the self-styled “newspaper of record” ridiculed the Times as a “propaganda megaphone” for the establishment, war, and more.
Liberty-minded insiders at the UN who have spoken to this reporter have long warned that it would be preferable to shut down and abolish the UN agencies — particularly to avoid the ongoing abuse of the global bureaucracies by the Communist Chinese regime and other autocracies to spy on the West, undermine Western economies, restrict liberty, legitimize tyranny, and more. A 1995 non-paper by the U.S. State Department entitled “Readying the United Nations for the 21st Century” recommended shutting down and consolidating a wide array of UN programs, agencies, and schemes. Today, more than a few prominent voices have continued to call for shutting down UNESCO, UNIDO, the UN HRC, and numerous other out-of-control bureaucracies.
But that is not enough. American taxpayers pay between $8 billion and $10 billion each year to the UN, more than 185 other member states combined. And in return, the American people, their liberties, their Constitution, and their national independence are subject to constant and vicious attack from the dictators club and its leading officials. Activists are hopeful that, under President Trump, that will begin to wind down. Congress is also working to defund the UN. But as long as the "dictators club" is left alive to limp along with U.S. membership, it will inevitably come back to wage war on freedom and self-government eventually.
Of course, Trump's expected actions represent an excellent place to start — especially after eight years of Obama, who in his last speech to the dictator-dominated UN General Assembly openly called for America to “accept constraints,” “giving up some freedom of action” (also known as self-government), and “binding ourselves to international rules.” However, a much better and more permanent solution would be to get the U.S. out of the UN completely. Legislation to do that, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act (H.R. 193), is currently sitting in the House Foreign Affairs Committee. And with enough public pressure, 2017 can be the year that America finally breaks free of the dictators club.

Related articles:
Top CFR Globalist Warns UN Will Get “Hammered” by Trump
Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN Introduced in New Congress
President Trump Unveils Plans to Undo Much of Obama's Damage
Congressman Mike Rogers Introduces Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN
Congress Planning to Defund UN as Critics Seek Full Withdrawal
#Brexit to #Amexit: Keep the Momentum Going!
After Equating Trump With ISIS, UN Freaks Out Over His Victory
U.S. Independence Attacked as Never Before by UN Interdependence
New UN Chief: Globalist, Socialist, Extremist
United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.
Philippines President Threatens to Withdraw From UN  
Trump: "Americanism, Not Globalism, Will Be Our Credo”
The United Nations: On the Brink of Becoming a World Government
Sen. Rand Paul Would be “Happy to Dissolve” the UN


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
By Professor Steven Yates

January 28, 2017
The other day, information came my way about the fate of Yazidi girls and women at the hands of ISIS. The Yazidi are a Kurdish people indigenous to what was Mesopotamia. They live primarily in what is now the Nineveh Province in what is now northwestern Iraq, although there are Yazidi communities in both Syria and Turkey. Their religion is a blend of Zoroastrianism, Islam, Judaism and Christianity, with links to Sufiism.
They had already been caught between U.S. troops and Iraqi insurgents. Not being Muslims and being a peaceful people, they were sitting targets for the Islamic State.
ISIS militants came to the Yazidi region of Shingal on August 3, 2014. Thousands of Yazidis were killed, kidnapped, or sexually enslaved. The article I received spoke of Yazidi girls being “sold” for a few packs of cigarettes.
Mirza Ismael, who chairs the Yazidi Human Rights Organization-International, said, “Some of these women and girls have had to watch 7-, 8-, and 9-year-old children bleed to death before their eyes, after being raped by ISIS militia multiple times a day. ISIS militias have burned Yazidi girls alive for refusing to convert and marry ISIS men. Why? Because we are not Muslims and because our path is the path of peace. For this we are being burned alive: for living as men and women of peace.”
There is, of course, a massive international slave and “sex worker” trade in that part of the world. Girls who have not yet entered puberty, some of them kidnapped, are repeatedly gang raped by ISIS militiamen many of whom are pedophiles. If the girls cry out in protest, they are beaten bloody, often to death. Those who try to escape and are caught can have their noses or ears or hands or feet cut off.
Radical Islam, of course, sees women as less than property. It is illegal in countries controlled by Radical Islam for women to receive an education. Most can’t read or write their native language. They are forbidden to leave their houses without male approval.
I present this live horror show as the perfect backdrop for these highly-touted (by Western corporate media, anyway) women’s marches in Washington and other major Western cities following the Trump inauguration, protesting actions they seem to believe the Trump administration is about to undertake.
There were many speakers at these events. One of them, actress Ashley Judd, read a poem in which she asked why “tampons are taxed when Viagra and Rogaine are not.”
In this one query, given all we reviewed above, you should see the reasons why the American Left has no credibility — none whatsoever. It had none before the Donald Trump era began on January 20. But now the fact (and it isn’t an “alternative fact”) is out in the open, or should be.
People like Ashley Judd, other celebrities including far wealthier and more famous ones like Madonna, live in a bubble of privilege — and I don’t mean that leftist invention, “white privilege.” I mean the privilege of being able to open their mouths and be heard by millions despite their utter cluelessness.
One of the criticisms I sometimes hear of U.S. citizens is that when all is said and done, we know little of what goes on outside our borders. I doubt most Americans have heard of the Yazidi, or know that ISIS overwhelmed them on August 3, 2014. After all, I’m sure Kim Kardashian did something that week!
It is unclear how many women participated in these grandiose marches. What is clear is that they have no idea how well off they are compared to their counterparts elsewhere in the world. As children they were taught to read and write. They went to school alongside boys. As adults they can come and go as they please, without asking permission. They can go to college and pursue careers. They can gain visibility (with or without actual talent). Some of the world’s wealthiest celebrities are American women.
Yes, yes, yes, I know there were women who struggled and fought for those rights. I saw a list on the Left-leaning Medium site just the other day. I also know that today’s whiners aren’t qualified to polish those women’s shoes.
One of their biggest fears seems to be that under the Trump administration and the new GOP-controlled Congress they might lose the “right” to kill their unborn children and have the U.S. federal government pay for it if they can’t pay for it themselves, which means taxpayers, some of whom are pro-life, will continue being coerced into helping fund the killing of unborn babies.
They are afraid Planned Parenthood might be defunded and shut down. I have the feeling, though, that the Madonnas and Ashley Judds of the world have enough money between them — that there is enough money in the community of celebrity women generally — that they could keep Planned Parenthood open, privately funded, and serving women’s legitimate health needs. I wonder if this has occurred to any of them. Probably not. They would have to stop whining, get up off their celebrated duffs, and start doing something useful.
Why do I keep mentioning Madonna?

Because the other day she was quoted as having thought about “blowing up the White House.” When I read that, what raced through my mind was, “Why isn’t that a terroristic threat?”

Then Secret Service started looking into the matter. She did some of her fanciest backpedaling, saying her remark was taken out of context. I don’t believe she meant it literally, of course. She was just doing what Left-leaning celebrities do best, which is shoot off their mouths. But with the thought now out on the table, who knows what one of her fanatic followers might do?
The American Left has lost control of the public narrative. Other voices, including from alternative media with alternative narratives, are now being listened to. Leftists can’t stand it, and are reacting as they typically do when they can’t have their way: getting verbally abusive and violent.
Outside the now-infamous Deploraball [sic.] in Washington the night before the Inauguration, writer James Allsup, a Trump supporter from Seattle, was targeted outside the event by leftist protesters along with some of his fellow attendees. Pushing and shoving ensued. After hearing someone yell, “Die, Nazi!” Allsup was punched while others filmed it, then struck in the head with a metal flagpole. He had to go to the ER for stitches.
This was only one example, and it is hardly an outlier. We reported on the harassment of Trump supporters and attendees of his rallies as far back as last spring, when thousands of University of Illinois at Chicago students took to the streets, compelling Trump to cancel a scheduled appearance out of public safety concerns.
It was not Trump supporters, moreover, who began to shut down major thoroughfares and interstate highways trying to block attendees from reaching Hillary Clinton rallies.
Now there is abundant evidence that the Left is in total meltdown mode. A friend of mine who lives in Texas sent me this the other day.
I know that was painful. She either didn’t know she was being filmed or didn’t care.
Do these people have any idea how silly they look and sound?
Author and blogger Charles Hugh Smith has a brilliant essay about what happened to the Left. He goes further into the history of Marxism then we need to worry about here, but what it boils down to: their obsessions with political correctness and identity politics cost the Left the support of the American working class.
For all practical purposes, they threw this support away, because so many American workers are straight white Christian males, and straight white Christian males are history’s biggest villains, didn’t you know?
A lot of Democrats have yet to figure out that had they not throw this obviously important segment of the electorate under the bus, their candidate might have won!
That wouldn’t have given the Left credibility. The Clintons sold out to the postmodern religions of money and power years ago; neither would know any other reality if it walked up and bit them. Hillary’s arrogant refusal to campaign in certain states was a dead giveaway: she didn’t think she’d need the white working class vote to defeat Donald Trump.
She lost each of those states to Trump. Reality always gets the last laugh.
Now, Bernie Sanders has offered to work with Trump on trade issues. Sanders just might be getting it (maybe, I hope).
The American Left’s ignorance may be exceeded only by its volume and its capacity for violence, but leftists are not Donald Trump’s most formidable enemies.

The globalists — or the super-elite, the global elite, or the international financial cartel, call them what you will — are Trump’s most formidable enemies. Those paying attention know they just held their annual World Economic Forum confab in Davos, Switzerland. The number one topic: “populist” insurgencies in Europe (think: Brexit, Geert Wilder in the Netherlands, Marine Le Pen in France) as well as in the U.S., i.e., the growing resistance to their economic domination of the planet, with all its externalities which include the wanton destruction of advanced nations’ middle classes and mass migrations caused by their incessant wars. Globalists, incidentally, like wars! Wars are very profitable! Ask those in the upper echelons of Halliburton!
The proximate cause of the European “populist” insurgency is Muslim mass migration which is tearing their countries apart. France, reeling from multiple terror attacks over the past couple of years, has a problem dwarfing anything the U.S. has to worry about.
I’ve long thought Trump misplayed his hand with Mexicans. He could have pointed out that Mexico’s agricultural workers were hurt as badly by NAFTA as the U.S. manufacturing base. He would have had Hispanic communities on his side, as he moves to renegotiate or scrap super-elite-driven “free trade” deals and enforce U.S. immigration laws just as Mexico enforces its immigration laws.
Muslims from places where ISIS is now established are far more dangerous. When a leftist whines about Islamophobia — among all the fake phobias the Left has invented over the years, that one has to be the stupidest! — I want to ask her how many more San Bernardino type workplace shootings or Orlando type nightclub massacres she would countenance, and what she would say to families of innocent people killed by newly transplanted Muslim immigrants who turned out to be ISIS sympathizers?
I’m sure the pseudo-intellectuals who championed Europe’s open borders policies didn’t think they’d be dealing with violent, unassimilable populations destroying neighborhoods in France, Germany, Hungary, Sweden, and elsewhere. So please don’t somebody write me and tell me nothing like that could happen in the U.S.
Well, under Donald Trump’s watch it won’t happen. I think — I hope! — we can be assured of that!
The problem, though, remains the globalists, the super-elite. They haven’t gone away, and I don’t believe for five seconds they are willing to allow one rogue “blue collar billionaire” to upend plans they’ve been working on longer than most of us have been alive without trying to do something about it — something possibly worse than anything Madonna might have thought up. Just keep in mind: Trump has inherited a mammoth stock market bubble; global debt has never been higher; the only thing standing between the present world and a massive depression is continued money printing by central banks. Were there a planned economic downturn — the Meltdown of 2008 on steroids! — given their control over corporate media, and given the gullibility the Left regularly displays, for globalists to get away with blaming Trump and other “populists” would be child’s play! 
 These are the things that worry me the most right now! Plus the fact that everything the Left is saying and doing to try and weaken and de-legitimize Donald Trump plays right into the hands of the globalists. 

If the Left wanted to make itself useful, its members would forget their marches and start monitoring pro-globalist sites on the Internet. There are quite a few, actually, like The Economist, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy Magazine, Bloomberg, and Project Syndicate. Globalists, in their hubris, cannot keep their mouths shut, either. Across the aisle, survivalist author Brandon Smith has useful advice on how globalists think. My book Four Cardinal Errors: Reasons for the Decline of the American Republic (2011) is still in print, as is my “The Real Matrix” series. The latter is incomplete, but not terribly dated.
In other words, now that Donald Trump is President there is work to be done informing those who care about where the real danger lies. And frankly — I hate to be blunt about it, but — leftists, you are in the way!


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
By Rev. Austin Miles 

January 28, 2017
WASHINGTON, D.C. --The days of a gentle slap on the wrist accompanied by whispering, "Naughty Naughty," are over. There's a new sheriff in town who takes a different approach to thuggery. Two hundred and thirty of the masked rioters who tried to invade the Inauguration of the new President were arrested, charged with Felony Rioting by the U.S. Attorney and face 10 years in prison along with a $25,000 fine. At last, justice will be served for political criminal activity.
All welfare benefits should be cancelled for those involved in the riots with the intention of interfering with the constitutional process of electing a president and causing destruction. Every penny of the fine should be paid in full before release, and that sentence should be 10 years of hard labor which is not unreasonable. Justice Department, please take note.
The protesters seem to have plenty of stamina and physical strength to throw things around, swing sledge hammers into store windows to smash them, set cars on fire along with trash bins that they threw into the streets and set ablaze. They also publicly burned the American Flag. So they are not lacking physical strength to work. These hoodlums should not be collecting welfare or other benefits. They owe US. We owe them nothing. They are perfectly able to work and earn their keep.
It is a new day in America. There is no more coddling criminals, no more 'political correctness' but instead, stern punishment for lawlessness and creating havoc.
A Presidential inauguration Ceremony is supposed to be a distinguished event. That is how it was designed. Communist Leader George Soros paid protesters to disrupt this transfer of power in D.C. in an attempt to spoil the most important event in the country. He did not succeed.
These paid imbeciles attacked people trying to get to the inauguration, harassed attendees (actually striking some), set cars on fire, tried to block entrances to the ceremony, and broke store windows. They set a stretch limo on fire and spray painted, "We the People" on the side of the burning limousine. They smashed TV trucks which is strange since the main payoff for these nitwits is television attention. That shows how bright they are.
TV personality Larry King was in his studio doing a program. When he came out he found that all the windows of his SUV had been smashed.
The anarchists were dressed head to toe in black with faces covered so as not to be identifiable, which is illegal. One of the rioters draped himself or herself in a rainbow flag.
Soros not only set up various organizations to carry out these 'protests,' but also worked with 50 organizations, mostly sponsoring Muslim organizations, to put together the national women's march throughout the U.S. the day after the inauguration to make it appear that nobody liked Trump. Not so. Millions upon millions of people love President Trump and are happily relieved that he is now our Commander-in-Chief.
And by the way, the trash these women left strewn in the streets was the worst to ever be seen. They did not have the decency to clean up their mess since they have no decency.
What has NOT been adequately reported is the LOOTING that has become a mainstay of such anti-American events. They kept that quiet so as not to make the looters look bad and cause stereotyping. Store windows were broken as Black Lives Matter participants, as usual, grabbed what they could. They should have their welfare benefits cancelled as well.
This rampage by anti-Americans took place only two blocks from the White House. Six police officers were injured by being hit with rocks thrown at them. It is of interest to know that "Bikers for Trump," a sturdy looking group was on hand to deal with some of the protesters. The anarchists held back in the presence of the bikers knowing full well that the bikers were ready and more than willing to do serious battle.
A note to President Donald Trump. BRAVO! Yes withdraw all welfare and other government benefits from everyone who took place in those third world style riots. And this should include everyone who is a part of Black Lives Matter, another creation of Soros. Begin proceedings to charge George Soros with Treason and Sedition. There is more than enough evidence to show that he is a traitor and it is time to deal with him as such.
His home country Hungary is preparing to take actions against him. Russia would love to get their hands on him and Israel wants him in their hands. He needs to be dealt with and removed from the scene. His enormous wealth can be confiscated to repair the damage he and those he hired have caused not only to America, but countries throughout the world whose economies have been wrecked by Soros as well as currencies around the world being devalued due to his manipulation.
When you think of the recent events, one must ask, where's the beef? The new President wants America to again be prosperous, our military strengthened in order to protect us from enemies, and better relations with the world and for Christians to not have to hide their faith or Who they worship .He wants better job opportunities for America and for families to live in peace.
 He wants to turn Obama's misrepresented health care plan around and replace that with affordable health care for everyone. He wants to do more for our veterans and military (he just gave military personnel their first raise), actual education for our children, and to carefully vet anyone who wants to come here from other countries. And he will block all efforts to prevent citizens from saying, Merry Christmas during the Holiday season.

So what can be objectionable to this agenda? Absolutely nothing. It is something to be desired for all with the exception of these ignorant misinformed bums who think they will be better under Communism, better known as The New World Order. I have seen what life under Communism is like. Believe me, you do NOT want that. And President Trump believes in the celebration of life for all.
Yes, we have a new sheriff in town and millions of people are backing him and praying for him. We have been ushered, by God, into a new era...a new day. With God's help, we have taken back our country. Let us never forget What God has done for us. Christians, be visible.


 Trump signs executive order for “extreme vetting” to “keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the USA”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
It is not yet clear whether the signed text is the same, or how it differs, but a published draft of the executive order “Protecting the Nation from Terrorist Attacks by Foreign Nationals” stated:
In order to protect Americans, we must ensure that those admitted to this country do not bear hostile attitudes toward our country and its founding principles. We cannot, and should not, admit into our country those who do not support the U.S. Constitution, or those who would place violent religious edicts over American law. In addition, the United States should not admit those who engage in acts of bigotry and hatred (including “honor” killings, other forms of violence against women, or the persecution of those who practice other religions) or those who would oppress members of one race, one gender, or sexual orientation.
Will officials try to vet for Sharia supremacism and support for honor killings, dhimmitude, and Sharia oppression of women? It will be interesting to see how that will be done.
“Trump Signs Two Executive Orders; Expands Power of Military, ‘Extreme Vetting,’” by Phil McCausland and Courtney Kube, NBC News, January 27, 2017:
President Donald Trump signed two executive orders on Friday that dramatically expand the nation’s military and so-called “extreme vetting” of visa seekers from terror-plagued countries — moves aimed at strengthening the U.S. response to terrorism both home and abroad.
In signing the order, Trump pledged to “keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the United States of America.”
Extreme vetting is an idea that evolved from Trump’s controversial Muslim ban that he called for in Dec. 2015, which would address the refugees entering the country.
“We’ve taken in tens of thousands of people. We know nothing about them,” Trump said in an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity on Thursday. “They can say they vet them. They didn’t vet them. They have no papers. How can you vet somebody when you don’t know anything about them and you have no papers?”
Though the United States government already utilizes a thorough nine-step vetting system for refugees, the president’s executive order is said to go further. It is unclear what these steps would mean and if it would target any particular religious group as the president stated on the campaign trail….
 Feds Reinvestigating Syrian Refugees 
Not Thoroughly Vetted
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
Federal agents are re-investigating dozens of Syrian refuges who were admitted into the United States without being thoroughly vetted. Some of these refugees had potentially negative information in their files that was not discovered prior to their admission, two unnamed U.S. law-enforcement officials told the Los Angeles Times.
Immigration authorities are reviewing the cases of some refugees, including one who failed a polygraph test when he applied for employment at an overseas U.S. military installation. Another refugee being re-investigated may have been in communication with an Islamic State (ISIS) leader, according to the officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter.
The Times reported that immigration agents have not concluded that any of the refugees being re-investigated should have been rejected for entry, but the flaw in the vetting process — which was discovered in late 2015 and corrected last year — prevented U.S. officials who conducted background checks on the refugees from learning possible “derogatory” information about them.
The officials said that at the very least, the intelligence lapse would have triggered further investigation that might have resulted in some asylum applications being rejected.
A report about this security lapse in American Thinker was critical of how the anonymous agents’ exchange with the Times was phrased. American Thinker’s Ed Straker noted:
Do you appreciate the minimalist way this was written?  There’s nothing to worry about — merely “potentially negative information in their files.” Doesn't sound very serious, does it? The refugees whose cases are under review include one who failed a polygraph test when he applied to work at a U.S. military installation overseas and another who may have been in communication with an Islamic State leader, according to the officials. I would say communicating with an Islamic State leader would be very “potentially negative information” in a refugee's file. Wouldn’t you?
Another report in the Daily Caller noted that former President Obama’s administration repeatedly stressed that the refugee-vetting process was very rigorous. The Caller quoted former White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest’s statement last August asserting that the administration was able to increase the number of Syrian refugees admitted in 2015 “without cutting any corners when it comes to security.” Earnest claimed that “significant screening was put in place to ensure that these individuals don’t pose an undue threat to our national security.”

In contrast, noted the Caller, Donald Trump repeatedly criticized the resettling of Syrian refugees in the United States throughout the 2016 campaign, saying they posed an unnecessary national security risk.
As we reported on January 26, President Trump is expected to sign an executive order soon that will suspend the issuance of visas and other immigration benefits to “nationals of countries of particular concern,” including Syria.
A draft of Trump’s executive order obtained by several news outlets (and posted online by the LexisNexis legal research website) directs the secretary of state to suspend the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) for 120 days and specifies that during that 120-day period, the secretary of state and the secretary of homeland security shall review the USRAP application and adjudication process to determine what additional procedures can be taken to ensure that those approved for refugee admission do not pose a threat to the security and welfare of the United States.
The order will also direct the secretary of homeland security, in consultation with the secretary of state, to submit to the president a list of countries recommended for inclusion on a presidential proclamation that would prohibit the entry of foreign nationals from each country on the list.
The only country that is specifically named in the order is Syria. According to the order,
The Secretaries of State and Homeland Security, as appropriate, shall cease refugee processing of and the admittance of nationals of Syria as refugees until such time as I have determined that sufficient changes have been made to the USRAP to ensure its alignment with the national interest.
The order also provides for “safe zones” in Syria:
Pursuant to the cessation of refugee processing for Syrian nationals, the Secretary of State, in conjunction with the Secretary of Defense, is directed within 90 days of the date of this order to produce a plan to provide safe areas in Syria and in the surrounding region in which Syrian nationals displaced from their homeland can await firm settlement, such as repatriation or potential third-country resettlement.
After the 120-day suspension, the United States will then cap the number of refugees admitted to our country at approximately 50,000. This number would include refugees from around the world, not just Syria or other areas of conflict in the Middle East.

Related articles:
Trump Executive Order to Ban Nationals of “Countries of Particular Concern”
Regarding Fake Passports for Syrians
Obama Scrapping Registration of Aliens From Mostly Muslim Nations
Sons of Middle Eastern Immigrants Recruited by Terrorist Groups
Border Patrol: Arrests of Pakistanis, Afghans Up This Year
Military Concerned About Large Numbers of Individuals From Terrorist Regions Crossing Border
Smuggling Network Brings Aliens With Terrorist Ties Across U.S. Border
Mexican Cartels Moving Terrorists Across Southern U.S. Border
Terrorist Smuggling Into U.S. a Real Concern
Pakistanis With Terrorism Ties Caught After Crossing U.S.-Mexican Border
 Trump says Syrian Christian refugees 
will be given priority
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“Pew Research Center said last October 38,901 Muslim refugees entered the United States in fiscal year 2016 from all countries – almost the same number of Christian refugees, 37,521.”
Reuters is being deliberately misleading. From Syria in 2016, the Obama administration admitted 12,587 refugees: 12,486 Muslims, 68 Christians, and 24 Yazidis. Trump is ending this obvious social engineering and saying that Syrian Christians, who have borne the brunt of persecution from jihad groups there, will be given priority.
This also shows the falsity of establishment propaganda media claims that Trump’s immigration ban would keep out non-Muslim victims of persecution by jihadis.

“Trump says Syrian Christian refugees will be given priority,” Reuters, January 27, 2017:
WASHINGTON, Jan 27 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump said on Friday that Syrian Christians will be given priority when it comes to applying for refugee status in the United States.
“If you were a Muslim you could come in, but if you were a Christian, it was almost impossible and the reason that was so unfair, everybody was persecuted in all fairness, but they were chopping off the heads of everybody but more so the Christians,” Trump said in an excerpt of an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network.
Pew Research Center said last October 38,901 Muslim refugees entered the United States in fiscal year 2016 from all countries – almost the same number of Christian refugees, 37,521….
 Trump Train Traveling At Mach Speed
 In Blitzkrieg Action Trump Delivers On Promises
Drain The Swamp, Drain The Sanctuary Cities
Trump Will Prosecute Clinton Crime Family
President Donald Trump With Sean Hannity 
FULL Interview
Robert F. Kennedy, Junior And The War Against 
Fake Vaccines

Vaccines: Trump Crosses Party Lines to Expose 

Big Pharma



 UK’s Theresa May, speaking in Philadelphia, lauds 
“the peaceful religion of Islam” and “internationalism”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
This will make for an interesting conversation between this self-righteous destroyer of her own nation and President Trump.
Theresa May recently boasted about having banned me from the country, and likened me to violent jihad terrorists. I was actually banned for noting, quite correctly, that “[Islam] is a religion and is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers…” That is what May thinks is the flip side of jihad terrorism. Meanwhile, May’s Britain has a steadily lengthening record of admitting jihad preachers without a moment of hesitation. Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri’s preaching of hatred and jihad violence was so hardline that he was banned from preaching in Pakistan, but the UK Home Office welcomed him into Britain. The UK Home Office recently admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into the country, despite the fact that he has said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the easiest. Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth – tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination of the above.” May’s government also recently admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Meanwhile, it banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted from entering the country.
What does Theresa May think is going to be the outcome of all this? Does she think that by admitting jihad preachers such as Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri and jihad terrorists such as Jamshid Piruz into the U.K., while banning foes of jihad terror, she will pacify her restive and growing Muslim population, and obviate the jihad imperative? Does she really believe that if “Islamophobia” is stamped out, Muslims will see no need to respond with jihad?
Imagine how surprised she will be when she has managed to silence every last critic of Islam and jihad, and jihad will still rear its bloody head in her green and pleasant land. But it boggles the mind to think she could be this stupid in the first place. Is there no one in the British government with sufficient knowledge and courage to take the Prime Minister aside and explain to her that jihad violence arises from imperatives within Islam itself, which will not be blunted, calmed, or discarded in the face of kindness from infidels?

“Britain’s Theresa May in U.S.: Islam is Peaceful, Globalism Good, Climate Change a Priority,” by Raheem Kassam, Breitbart, January 26, 2017:
British Prime Minister Theresa May used her speech in Philadelphia to needle the new Trump administration on a number of issues ranging from globalism to climate change, Islam, and even to defending the European Union.
Mrs. May began her speech at the Republican Retreat in Philadelphia with a brief history of Anglo-American relations, invoking the spirit of the Founding Fathers of the U.S. as well as expressing gratitude towards America’s involvement in the World Wars of the 20th century.
But her speech was also littered with politically correct terms, as well as left and center-left talking points regarding international institutions, Islam, and radical Islamic terrorism, the latter of which she called “Islamist extremism”.
The British premier compared “open, liberal and democratic” societies in the West versus “closed, coercive” ones. She hailed the United Nations, praised the World Bank, and called NATO “the cornerstone” of Western defense.
And Mrs. May also spoke of the necessity for multilateralism in stark contrast with the line pushed by the White House — which prefers bilateralism — over recent days. She cited the need to tackle “climate change” as one of the reasons to back globalist institutions.
She called for the two nations to be “internationalist” and “global”, though noted “Some of these organisations are in need of reform and renewal”.
And while committing to the destruction of the Islamic State, she failed to mention the name of the group, choosing instead the term “Daesh” — a word preferred by politically correct types and most notably popularized by former Secretary of State John Kerry and President Barack Obama.
She went on to describe “radical Islamists”, stopping short of echoing the phrases used by the new U.S. administration including “radical Islamic terrorism”.
The British PM stated: “Of course we should always be careful to distinguish between this extreme and hateful ideology and the peaceful religion of Islam, and the hundreds of millions of its adherents, including millions of our own citizens, and those further afield who are so often the first victims of this ideology’s terror”….
Curiously, despite Britain’s Brexit vote, Mrs. May said of the European Union: “We will build a new partnership with our friends in Europe. We are not turning our back on them, or on the interests and the values that we share. It remains overwhelmingly in our interests – and in those of the wider world – that the EU should succeed”.
Clearly, she is abandoning Brexit, which is no surprise at all. It remains to be seen whether there are enough free Britons to cast her out of office and install a Prime Minister who will make Brexit a reality.
Donald Trump Swearing-In James Mattis 
as Secretary of Defense

 Message to the Department of Defense 
from Secretary of Defense James Mattis
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
USA – -( It’s good to be back and I’m grateful to serve alongside you as Secretary of Defense.
Together with the Intelligence Community we are the sentinels and guardians of our nation.
We need only look to you, the uniformed and civilian members of the Department and your families, to see the fundamental unity of our country.

You represent an America committed to the common good; an America that is never complacent about defending its freedoms; and an America that remains a steady beacon of hope for all mankind.

Every action we take will be designed to ensure our military is ready to fight today and in the future. Recognizing that no nation is secure without friends, we will work with the State Department to strengthen our alliances.
Further, we are devoted to gaining full value from every taxpayer dollar spent on defense, thereby earning the trust of Congress and the American people.

I am confident you will do your part. I pledge to you I’ll do my best as your Secretary.




 Kellyanne Conway Full Speech on Abortion 
at March For Life Speech