Thursday, January 19, 2017


 CNN: If Trump is Killed During Inauguration, Obama Appointee Would be President
 Network slammed for encouraging violence 
with bizarre report
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
CNN has been criticized for airing a report which revealed that an Obama appointee would become president if Donald Trump was killed during an attack on the inauguration tomorrow.
Entitled Disaster could put Obama cabinet member in Oval Office, the report admits that there is no specific threat targeting the inauguration, but goes on to speculate about “who would be in charge if an attack hit the incoming president….just as the transfer of power is underway”.
An individual named the “designated presidential successor” will not attend the inauguration as a security precaution, “but it won’t be a Trump cabinet secretary….it will be an Obama appointee,” reports CNN.

The report emphasizes that “a president from the prior administration” will take power if there is an attack due to the fact that none of Trump’s cabinet secretaries have been confirmed yet.
According to CNN, the designated presidential successor is likely to be Tom Shannon, the Under Secretary For Political Affairs, and an Obama appointee.
The report teases the potential for an attack on the inauguration by asserting it would create “chaos” and “high theater,” before airing clips from ABC’s Designated Survivor show in which Kiefer Sutherland plays an obscure cabinet secretary who is “unexpectedly thrust into the presidency after an attack at the capitol during a State of the Union address.”
Given the huge number of death threats leveled at Trump – including one family friend of Hillary Clinton who was arrested after he threatened to assassinate Trump at the inauguration – is CNN irresponsible in drawing attention to this issue?
Respondents to the video on YouTube, which was heavily thumbed down, slammed CNN for almost encouraging a violent attack against Trump.
“Totally not suggesting anything here, huh CNN?” commented one.
“So leftist terrorists know who they need to take out, so that dems can stay in power? This is irresponsible journalism,” added another.
“I flagged this video as dangerous to the president elect, and that it might foment violence,” wrote another.
The charges are not without precedent. After Thomas DiMassimo tried to rush the stage to violently confront Trump during an event in Ohio last year, CNN gave him a platform to denounce Trump as a “bully”.
 If Trump is Killed During Inauguration, Obama Appointee Would Be President

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case — so named by the Justice Department. CAIR officials have repeatedly refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. Several former CAIR officials have been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this, but the original reporter stands by her story.) A California chapter distributed a poster telling Muslims not to talk to the FBI, and a Florida chapter distributed pamphlets with the same message. CAIR has opposed virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United Arab Emirates. A CAIR operative recently called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.
But as far as Hamas-linked CAIR is concerned, it is Franklin Graham who is the “extremist.” Right. For eight years now, this unsavory gang of Islamic supremacist thugs has enjoyed immense access and influence in the Obama administration. That access and influence should soon be drastically curtailed.

“‘Extremist’ Franklin Graham Must Not Pray At Inauguration, Trump’s Team Told,” by Harry Farley, Christian Today, January 13, 2017 (thanks to The Geller Report):
Franklin Graham should be removed from Donald Trump’s inauguration line up, the US’ largest Muslim civil rights group said on Thursday.
The outspoken conservative pastor and son of evangelist Billy Graham is due to pray at the ceremony next week in Washington.
But the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) called on the president-elect to drop Franklin, who they described as a “notorious Islamophobe”, in order to unite the country.
“If President-elect Trump truly seeks to unite our nation as he promised in his acceptance speech, he will limit the list of those offering prayers at the inauguration to religious leaders who work to bring us together, not to create divisions between faiths,” said CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad.
“Rev Graham’s ill-informed and extremist views are incompatible with the Constitution and with American values of religious liberty and inclusion.”
A statement from CAIR pointed to comments from Graham in which he called Islam a “very evil and wicked religion”.
Graham also claims Islam is incompatible with American values.
“Every Muslim that comes into this country has the potential to be radicalised – and they do their killing to honour their religion and Muhammad,” he wrote on Facebook in 2015.
“”[T]rue Islam cannot be practiced in this country. You can’t beat your wife. You cannot murder your children if you think they’ve committed adultery or something like that, which they do practice in these other countries,” he once told CNN.
“I don’t agree with the teachings of Islam and I find it to be a very violent religion.”…


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Although Fatah is reputed to be “moderate” and Hamas “extremist,” in 
reality, there isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between them.
“Fatah and Hamas agree to form unity Palestinian government to end election gridlock,” by Bethan McKernan, Independent, January 19, 2017:
The governing bodies of the West Bank and Gaza Strip have agreed to bury their differences to form a unity government in order to finally hold delayed elections.
The secular Fatah-led Palestinian Authority, based in Ramallah, and Islamist militant group Hamas, which seized control of Gaza in 2007, will form a new National Council including the Palestinian diaspora to hold elections.
“We have reached agreement under which, within 48 hours, we will call on [Palestinian Authority President] Mahmoud Abbas to launch consultations on the creation of a government,” Fatah spokesperson Azzam al-Ahmad told media after three days of reconciliation talks in the Russian capital of Moscow concluded on Tuesday.
“Today the conditions for [the idea] are better than ever,” Mr Ahmad added.
Relations between Fatah and Hamas have been tense since Hamas seized control of the Gaza Strip a decade ago.
The first elections since 2007 were due to be held in 2016 but were delayed multiple times after legal complaints filed by various political actors and a high court ruling found elections could only be held in the West Bank.
The non-official Russian brokered talks also involved representatives from the Shia Islamic Jihad militant group, which has not been present at political talks in years.
While in Moscow, Palestinian representatives also met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, asking him to pressure US President-elect Donald Trump into reneging on a campaign promise to move the US Embassy to Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem….


 In Davos, Globalists Hail Leadership of Communist Chinese Tyrant
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
In a bizarre spectacle that took many low-level establishment-minded analysts by surprise, brutal Communist Chinese dictator Xi Jinping was crowned the king of globalism this week by embattled Western globalists at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos. Blasting “excessive pursuit of profits,” Xi (shown) offered a “vigorous defense” of globalism and pseudo-“free trade” schemes in his keynote speech at the event. He also suggested that his brutal regime was ready to step in to a leadership role in the emerging new world order as the United States changes direction. However, as the globalist alliance with savage communist tyranny comes out of the closet, Western voters are likely to become even more hostile to the extreme agenda of their would-be overlords.
Without a trace of irony, the brutal dictator claimed to be working for “the people” while promoting “liberalization” and “openness,” as if his communist regime believed in either of those values. Bizarrely, Xi even echoed the Gettysburg address by former U.S. President Abraham Lincoln. “China is pursuing development of the people, by the people, and for the people,” claimed Xi, as if the blood-drenched communist oppression of the largest nation in the world were actually intended to benefit its victims. “Globalism certainly creates some problems that we all need to solve together. But what should really scare us is any [leader] not willing to live up to the challenge.”

Xi then continued shilling for more of the globalist status quo in which the American economy gets hollowed out, Americans lose their jobs and industries, and the U.S. government breaks the back of American taxpayers with trillions in odious debt to Beijing and other nefarious forces. “It is true that economic globalization has created new problems, but this is no justification to write off economic globalization altogether,” the tyrant said through a translator. “We must remain committed to developing free trade and investment, promoting liberalization and facilitation through opening up, and saying no to protectionism.... We should say no to protectionism. Saying yes to protectionism is like locking oneself in a dark room. Wind and rain may be kept outside, but so is light and air. No one will emerge as a winner in a trade war.”
Ironically, the regime in Beijing imposes massive trade barriers on Western firms seeking to operate in China. In addition to its massive economic espionage apparatus, which steals technology and trade secrets from Western companies like they were Chinese serfs, Beijing imposes strict rules on companies hoping to do business in China. It also uses tariffs to protect domestic industry, subsidies to help crush foreign competition, currency manipulation to boost exports, and widespread dirty tricks to hamper its competitors. The Chinese economy, meanwhile, rather than the free-market utopia imagined by dishonest and naive analysts, is dominated by ruthless state-owned enterprises that exploit the equivalent of slave labor across China. The regime also abuses taxpayers worldwide by using the United Nations to subsidize its exports and shipping.
Xi also took repeated and obvious shots at U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, who, unlike Xi, was actually elected — all without ever saying Trump's name. In fact, more than a few analysts painted the entire speech as a heroic pro-globalism diatribe against Trump and the fed up American voters who put him into office. “When encountering difficulties, we should not complain about ourselves, blame others, lose confidence or run away from responsibilities,” Xi continued in his speech to fawning establishment globalists and hangers-on representing government, business, banking, academia, and beyond. “Instead we should join hands and rise to the challenge.”
As history shows, though, joining hands with communist dictators basically always results in tragedy — oftentimes even for their ostensible allies. Communist revolutionary Leon Trotsky, for example, ended up with an ice pick in his head after a falling out with his murderous comrades. And the regime in China has already shown that it has no qualms about killing — in fact, the Communist Chinese Party state has murdered more innocent people than any other government in human history. It continues to murder and torture dissidents, even harvesting organs from members of proscribed religious minorities. The regime also continues to use coercive abortions to enforce its barbaric population-control policies as it engages in what experts call the “cultural genocide” of Tibet.
A senior economic adviser for Trump responded to Xi's comments and insinuations, saying the incoming administration was merely seeking fairness in trade policy. “If you want to send your goods to us and if you want to buy our debt, then we just want an equal paying field,” said Trump adviser Tom Barrack. “Intellectual property, the enforcement of trademark rights and the ability to have a true bilateral negotiation is what it’s about. And it’s simply a negotiation. We now outsource our trade policy to third party entities. It’s not going to happen anymore.” Among other third party entities that purport to set trade policy for America that benefits the Communist Chinese dictatorship at the expense of American workers is the World Trade Organization (WTO). But that is just the tip of the iceberg.
Perhaps rubbing in the fact that his regime has already stolen the military, trade, and economic secrets of most of the WEF's attendees and the institutions they represent, Xi claimed that it was “not possible” any longer to stop the flow of technology and people across borders. Aside from Trump, the remark was widely interpreted as a swipe at British voters, who recently voted to exit the European Union super-state in a “Brexit,” partly out of concern for the mass-migration brought about by open borders. However, the remark was ironic considering that Switzerland, which hosts the WEF and is considered among most successful nations on Earth, is not an EU member and recently voted to cut off the mass immigration.    
The Chinese dictator, the first to attend the WEF, also defended the globalist United Nations “Paris Agreement,” an illegal pseudo-treaty on “climate change” signed by Obama but never ratified by the U.S. Senate as required by the Constitution. The controversial UN climate regime purports to require the imposition of devastating economic pain on the American people, all while boosting the brutal dictatorship ruling China and fleecing American taxpayers to prop up oppressive Third World dictatorships and kleptocrats via “climate finance” reparations. Trump declared on the campaign trail that he would “cancel” the UN scheme and stop sending U.S. tax dollars to advance the agenda. Before that, Trump highlighted the role played by Beijing in advancing what he called the man-made global-warming “hoax.” Unsurprisingly, Xi wants governments to “stick to it instead of walking away from it.”
Communist Chinese minions echoed their Dear Leader's phony narrative. “It shows China is not underestimating the danger of a trade war breaking out,” claimed He Weiwen, deputy director of the Beijing-based Center for China and Globalization and a former “business attache” for the regime in the United States. “China used to be a mere supporter of the U.S.-led global economic order. Now, as the incoming U.S. presidency shows signs of retreating, China is stepping up to take a leading role.” Of course, that development was hardly organic, and was brought about by the very same globalist establishment hobnobbing in the Swiss Alps. To understand how instrumental Western globalists have been in installing and then building up Communist China and the so-called “New World Order” Beijing is now championing, see the articles below this one.
Unsurprisingly, the establishment and its propagandists in the media put an easily debunked spin on the developments. The fake-news narrative pushed by Beijing's propaganda organs and the Western establishment media goes like this: Silly American voters surrendered their nation's lead role in promoting globalism by electing Trump, and now, the benign Communist Chinese regime is stepping in to fill the void and maintain sanity. In the real world, though, this magazine has been highlighting the fact that senior globalist schemers — billionaire Rothschild protégé George Soros, the Rockefeller dynasty, Henry Kissinger, the Council on Foreign Relations, and more — have long been grooming the ruthless Chinese dictatorship to take a lead role in their totalitarian “New World Order.” The day may have just come sooner than some globalist planners imagined.
As if on cue, Western globalists and their lackeys provided plenty of quotes fawning over the mass-murdering dictator to help drive the media narrative. “In a world marked by great uncertainty and volatility the world is looking to China,” claimed World Economic Forum boss Klaus Schwab before welcoming Xi to the stage, confusing extremist Western globalists with “the world,” as if the two were interchangeable. Former Swedish Prime Minister Carl Bildt, a Bilderberg meeting attendee embroiled in endless scandals, echoed the bogus narrative: “There is a vacuum when it comes to global economic leadership, and Xi Jinping is clearly aiming to fill it. With some success.” Eurasia Group boss Ian Bremmer, meanwhile, was widely quoted claiming that the reaction of Davos globalists to Xi's speech was “success on all counts.”
At the summit in Davos, the outgoing Obama administration, perhaps the most openly globalist in U.S. history, sent Secretary of State John Kerry and Vice President Joe Biden, both of whom fit right in among the Big Government-loving cronies and globalist schemers imagining themselves as the “global elite.” Trump did send an adviser, Anthony Scaramucci, who said that if the Chinese “really believe in globalism, and they really believe in the words of Lincoln, they have to reach now towards us and allow us to create this symmetry.” The “path to globalism in the world is through the American worker and the American middle class,” he claimed in a somewhat confusing statement, adding that “we want to have a phenomenal relationship with the Chinese.” His boss, Trump, has accused Communist China of devaluing its currency and ripping off America with help from domestic globalist stooges.
No matter what propaganda and platitudes the globalists in Davos pump out about “responsive” and “inclusive” rule over humanity, popular outrage is expected to continue growing against the establishment and its globalism, attacks on liberty, and other outrages perpetrated against everyday citizens. The developments in Davos are yet more evidence that the globalist-communist axis is circling the wagons against humanity. But with supposedly “liberal” and "capitalist" globalists getting in bed with a ruthless Communist Party mass-murderer infamous for savage political persecution, censorship, and oppression, the mask is coming off — and that is good news for mankind. “Here, we have the global elite embracing Xi as the anti-Trump,” King’s College of London War Studies Emeritus Professor Lawrence Freedman was quoted as saying in the Wall street Journal. In other words, globalists are finally coming out of the closet as ruthless totalitarians, dropping any pretense of “democracy” and “human rights.”
With American and British voters obviously fed up with the establishment's agenda for what top globalists and Chinese Communists regularly tout as the “New World Order” — basically totalitarian global rule by a tiny self-appointed elite — the schemers are undoubtedly plotting their next move. That means this is a very dangerous situation for America and the world. But now that the globalist alliance with Beijing is beyond dispute and globalists are openly identifying themselves as co-conspirators with the murderous totalitarians enslaving the people of China, the American people and their elected officials must act accordingly. The upcoming swamp draining should focus on all of the globalists in Davos willing to spit on American voters and join forces with the ruthless Chinese tyrant.

Related articles:
China: Staking Claim in the New World Order
Communist Chinese Dictator to Push Globalism at World Economic Forum
Chinese Tyranny 2.0
With Obama Out, Communist China Takes Lead on UN “Climate” Scam
UN Internet Summit Run by Beijing Pushes “Global Governance”
World Economic Forum Pushes Global Controls
CFR Globalist: End U.S. States, Build China-style Regional Gov't
Davos’ Theme of “Resilient Dynamism” Hides Real Agenda
Robots Transforming China, Causing Heartburn at World Economic Forum
Communist Chinese Agent Takes Over Interpol, Global Policing
Communist China Unveils Most Orwellian Scheme Ever
Globalist Henry Kissinger Outlines “New World Order”
China, G77 Tyrants, and UN Boss Demand “New World Order”
Chinese Spying in the United States


Robert Spencer in The Hill: Lindsay Lohan may have made her worst life choice yet
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
UPDATE: The Left-fascists at The Hill have caved in to pressure from Leftist and Islamic supremacist neo-brownshirts, and pulled this piece. However, it is reproduced in its entirety below.
Over at The Hill, I explain why Lindsay Lohan’s rumored conversion to Islam could be a worse life choice than all the drugs and drinking and everything else that has made her notorious:

Lindsay Lohan has sparked widespread speculation that she has converted to Islam by deleting everything on her Instagram account except for the Arabic greeting “Alaikum salam” (upon you be peace).
Her mother has denied the claim, but Lohan, who lives in Dubai, has not, even as congratulations have poured in from Muslims around the world. If the reports are true, then Lohan, who for years has worked hard at amassing a reputation as a celebrity train wreck, has just made her worst career move yet.
Lohan has fueled this kind of speculation in the past, saying in 2015: “My very close friends, who have been there for me a lot, in London are Saudi and they gave me the Qur’an and I brought it to New York because I was learning. It opened doors for me to experience spiritually, to find another true meaning. This is who I am.”
She didn’t say what “true meaning” she found in Qur’anic injunctions sanctioning wife-beating (Qur’an 4:34), devaluing of women’s testimony (Qur’an 2:282) and inheritance rights (Qur’an 4:11), allowance for polygamy (Qur’an 4:3), or mandate of warfare against and subjugation of unbelievers (Qur’an 9:29), but that’s just the beginning of the absurdity.
Is Lindsay Lohan prepared to venture out in public with everything covered except her face and hands, as per Muhammad’s injunction (Abu Dawud 4092)? Is she willing not to go out at all unless accompanied by a male guardian, as per Islamic law? Is she happy with being judged deficient in intelligence and religious commitment, as Muhammad said of women (Bukhari 304)?
Lindsay Lohan likely doesn’t know that any of this is in Islamic teaching. She probably knows about Islam only the things she has been told by her friends in Saudi Arabia and Dubai, who are no doubt anxious to add her to the list of celebrity converts to Islam. What these converts to Islam know about their new religion could have been taken from a President Barack Obama speech: that it is a noble, great religion, a religion of peace, and that those who raise concerns about jihad terrorism are racist, bigoted xenophobes.
So what’s not to like? Converts and prospective converts are never told about how so many converts to Islam end up as jihad terrorists, most notably including John Walker Lindh, the “Marin County Mujahid” who was discovered fighting alongside the Taliban and al-Qaeda against American troops in Afghanistan, and Adam Gadahn, the self-described “revolting geek of mass proportions” who, like Lindh, discovered Islam through rap music and black grievance theater (neither were black, but both wished they were), read the Qur’an and realized that one sure-fire way to please Allah was to wage jihad against infidels, and set out to do just that.
Gadahn, before he was killed in a drone strike, rose high in the ranks of al-Qaeda, even making English-language videos addressed to the American people and introduced by al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri himself. In them, Gadahn’s revolting geekiness is on full display, as he smacks his lips nervously, pedantically argues for the falsity of Christianity and the truth of Islam, and issues threats with a bravado bred at the console of a thousand video games. Gadahn, Lindh, and numerous other converts illustrate the appeal of conversion to Islam among the psychically marginal, who find comfort in the fact that Islam has a rule (and sometimes many rules) for every imaginable human activity, relieving them of the responsibility of having to make tough moral and ethical decisions themselves.
That may be what appeals to Lindsay Lohan, the very epitome of the rootless celebrity who left her moral compass behind so long ago that she may not even remember having one. It is extraordinarily unlikely, of course, that even if she has converted to Islam, that she will follow Lindh, Gadahn, and so very many other converts into jihad terror activity; however, she would do well to ponder this phenomenon, and ask herself why so many Americans who have converted to Islam have somehow gotten the idea that their new religion commands them to commit treason and mass murder.
That would, of course, require her to read that Qur’an she has been carrying around attentively, and to think for herself. No doubt that is just what her Saudi friends want her to do as well. If she really did it, she would put the rumors of conversion to rest once and for all. But that would require bucking Hollywood’s smart set and the Leftist intelligentsia’s received wisdom. Thus far in her outlandish public career, Lindsay Lohan has not demonstrated the courage to do that. But stranger things have happened.